There is a sense in which she presents the notion that coping with the idea that luxury living is costly to an innocent is disturbing. The author however doesn’t offer any judgments of the Omelas. However the story ends with a realization that there cannot be a satisfying reconciliation with the wretched life of the child. In the city people are cherishing life and wallowing in wealth while the innocent persons are in abject poverty and pain. Le Guin explores that idea of people refuting to admit that their happiness is built on the suffering of others. The poor and wealthy families are not experiencing the same issues since the political and economic systems seem to benefit the wealthy. The entire scene presents juxtaposition whereby there is a sharp contrast between the child and the entire city. Therefore, a certain lost soul gives millions permanent happiness. The author presents an idea of lonely torture which derives happiness to the entire population. In a great way, the child plays a fundamental role in the society since her suffering makes life people for those dwelling in Omelas. However, in this setting the idea varies in that there similar suffering for the subject the child in lieu and the entire city.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |